Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Why abortion is immoral.
1 The view that abortion is, with rare exceptions, seriously immoral has received little support in the recent philosophical literature. No doubt most philosophers affiliated with secular institutions of higher education believe that the anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument. The purpose of...
متن کاملWhy Abortion is Immoral
The view that abortion is, with rare exceptions, seriously immoral has received little support in the recent philosophical literature. No doubt most philosophers affiliated with secular institutions of higher education believe that the anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument. The purpose of t...
متن کاملthe acceptance of complainant s speech without witness with looking at the rule whenever not know, but by the complainant, accepts even if the witness is not
in some cases, the speech of complainant is accepted withoutwitness. anything that is known only by the claims his claiming isaccepted without witness. this famous principle has applications invarias puertas of jurisprudente suche as contracte, marriage,divorce and zakat. traditions, wise approach, induction, arguingand like this can prove it. sometimes declining the speech ofcomplainant create...
متن کاملSensationalized philosophy: a reply to Marquis's "Why abortion is immoral.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive...
متن کاملFinding truth even if the crowd is wrong
Over a hundred years ago Galton reported on the uncanny accuracy of the median estimate of the weight of an ox, as judged by spectators at a country fair [1]. Since then, the notion that the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ is superior to any individual has itself become a piece of crowd wisdom, raising expectations that web-based opinion aggregation might replace expert judgment as a source of policy gui...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bioethics
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0269-9702,1467-8519
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12533